The Liar's Dictionary: A Novel
3.8 3.8 out of 5 stars | 1,345 ratings
Price: 13.78
Last update: 09-10-2024
About this item
National Best Seller
"You wouldn’t expect a comic novel about a dictionary to be a thriller too, but this one is. In fact, [it] is also a mystery, love story (two of them) and cliffhanging melodrama." (The New York Times Book Review)
An award-winning novel that chronicles the charming misadventures of a lovelorn Victorian lexicographer and the young woman put on his trail a century later to root out his misdeeds while confronting questions of her own sexuality and place in the world.
Mountweazel n. the phenomenon of false entries within dictionaries and works of reference. Often used as a safeguard against copyright infringement.
In the final year of the nineteenth century, Peter Winceworth is toiling away at the letter S for Swansby’s multivolume Encyclopaedic Dictionary. But his disaffection with his colleagues compels him to assert some individual purpose and artistic freedom, and he begins inserting unauthorized, fictitious entries. In the present day, Mallory, the publisher’s young intern, starts to uncover these mountweazels in the process of digitization and through them senses their creator’s motivations, hopes, and desires. More pressingly, she’s also been contending with a threatening, anonymous caller who wants Swansby’s staff to “burn in hell”. As these two narratives coalesce, Winceworth and Mallory, separated by one hundred years, must discover how to negotiate the complexities of life’s often untrustworthy, hoax-strewn, and undefinable path. An exhilarating, laugh-out-loud debut, The Liar’s Dictionary celebrates the rigidity, fragility, absurdity, and joy of language while peering into questions of identity and finding one’s place in the world.
Top reviews from the United States
I want those spare words and might just start my own illustrated dictionary.
This book has no coherent story--or rather two non-coherent ones. The author delights in showing off for the purpose of proving how smart she is. Despite managing some gorgeous and original sentences, the book is full of overblown, wordy prose that contributes nothing to the story. The two stories are tied together only by the "mountweasels" created in one and searched for in the second. The ending (?) is empty. The book is the amalgam of two of those mountweasels:
"toblivious" (adj.) accidentally rereading a phrase or line due to lack of focus or desire to finish
"agrupt" (n. and adj.) irritation caused by having a denouement ruined
Ernest Hemingway where are you?