Haven't loaded it onto the computer yet, I am so looking forward to using it.
Learned on a PC, eventually bought a MAC. Loved it. When it finally developed several hardware problems I had to return to a PC due to cost of MAC. After much research, I know I can run Linux on a PC machine and still enjoy the basic principles of MAC since MAC is based on Linux.
They call these machines Hackintosh I believe, just without the cute little MAC buttons on the screen.
Red Hat Linux 9.0 Personal
3.2 3.2 out of 5 stars | 47 ratings
Price: 45
Last update: 12-19-2024
About this item
Red Linux 9 comes in 7 x86 based CDs and does not come in the orginal box.
Top reviews from the United States
Alvin Browning
5.0 out of 5 stars
Not a PC
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2017MP
1.0 out of 5 stars
No support from reseller
Reviewed in the United States on December 1, 2017
The software works great. The reseller refused to get me a registration card to make support available from red hat.
Impailer1
3.0 out of 5 stars
Had to return
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2013
Product was fine was no support for SATA hard drives so was unable to install on system I wanted to use
Freq Online Shopper
2.0 out of 5 stars
Pay for the support or shop else where
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2011
I used Unix many years ago and thought it could be a fun to install Linux in my old desktop. Without understanding the status of Red Hat Linux or the available choices, I bought an used Red Hat Linux 9. The installation was not a problem but I quickly ran into a series of problems that my 3Com wireless USB and USB mouse do not work and the Firefox that came with the Linux could not open Google's webpage.
After some study on the internet, I realized that Red Hat Linux 9 was so old that it requires a lot of update to work with the new hardware or the latest websites. Unless one is willing to pay the annual charge to Red Hat, Linux fan should look for other options.
After some study on the internet, I realized that Red Hat Linux 9 was so old that it requires a lot of update to work with the new hardware or the latest websites. Unless one is willing to pay the annual charge to Red Hat, Linux fan should look for other options.
J Salter
4.0 out of 5 stars
Linux is great, if not fully compatible with all hardware
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2004
First, let me start off by noting that almost all of the reviewers that gave Red Hat Linux 9 very low marks had mostly hardware incompatibility issues. They bought Red Hat, threw the CD in the CD drive, and hoped for the best, expecting it to be able to successfully detect and configure all of their particular hardware.
While Linux has made tremendous strides in hardware compatibility and usually can work with most hardware right out of the box, it does not have the advantage of market critical mass and monopolistic power that Microsoft has. Thus, all vendors that sell hardware for the home PC provide drivers for Windows, being that Windows has about 95% of that market. That being said, Linux now has made tremdous stides in hardware support. It supports most major hardware products, but lacks in the area of some of the more exotic or bleeding edge graphics cards, sound cards, network cards, and most winmodems. It's getting better all the time (due to open source developers reverse engineering, and many vendors providing drivers), but Linux can't boast the level of hardware support that Windows can, due to market realities.
The people who gave bad reviews attempted to blindly install Red Hat Linux on their machines, without checking for hardware support ahead of time. Thus, due to hardware incompatibility or configuration, they had headaches and wrongly blamed Linux.
My personal experience with Linux in general and Red Hat 9 in particular has been wonderful. I've installed it on an IBM Thinkpad 600E. The installation went smoothly and I only had to manualy choose the correct video driver. It did not detect the Mwave internal winmodem (I expected this) and did not detect the sound card, but I do not need sound on my notebook. Apparently it is possible to configure so that Red Hat can use the sound card, but I don't need it. But Red Hat did seamlessly detect everything else and it all worked beautifully.
I've had a lot of fun with Linux. I'm a programmer and it is chaulk full of development tools (without having to pay mega $ for MS Visual Studio). Linux is a programmers paradise. It also has everything MS Office has (with Open Office and KOffice). It can manipulate graphics with the GIMP, it has tons of games, and endless configuration possibilties. RH Linux loads both the Gnome and KDE desktop environments, and it's fun to play with both, being that they are not exactly alike, and both have different strengths and weeknesses. And both, quite frankly, are much more attractive and fun to use than the Fisher Price interface of Windows XP. They are also far more configurable, with much more eye candy than XP. I've also been able to successfully download and install and use huge software titles like JBuilder 5 and Eclipse (Java Integrated Development Environments).
I've also been completely impressed with the amazing stability and efficiency of Linux. I can crash an application, but it never affects the OS. I just have to kill the app, and everything else goes about it's merry way without a hitch. Contrast that with Windows XP, and all of it's bugs and the slightest application problem can bring it to it's knees (prompting you to send a bug report to MS). Or, of course, the infamous Blue Screen of Death. No BSOD in Linux at all. And finally, there are far fewer virus worries with Linux.
In short, Linux is great. It might be a bit rough around the edges for some newbie/non technical users, but it is very easy to use (just requires a small learning curve, just like anything else new) and can do so many great things, at a small fraction of the cost of MS alternatives.
Those new to Linux should probablly start off with a distribution that runs from a CD, like Knoppix. Knoppix automatically detects and configures your hardware. All you have to do is pop the CD in and reboot. And it is completely risk free because it does not touch your hard drive. Knoppix can give you a taste of how great Linux can be. And if you like what you see, you should first check hardware compatibility at the distros web site, than
probably re-partition your hard drive with Partition magic. And of the distro set up routines will detect the partitions and allow you easily set up a dual boot PC. Alternatively, buy a whole new PC with Linux pre-loaded (ensuring hardware compatibility). You can do that here at Amazon, or Walmart or Lindows.com, or many others. You can get a new PC for as little as $200 (the cost of WinXP by itself).
But do give it a try and be prepared for hardware compatibility and that it is a different OS, so there will be a small learning curve. It's very well worth the effort.
The only reasons I did not give Red Hat Linux 9 the full 5 stars is because Red Hat has ended their retail product, concentrating on the enterprise. Also, Red Hat Linux does not include a disc partitioning tool like Mandrake and SuSE do. But I've loved it. I'm now looking forward to partitioning my eMachines PC with WinXP, and loading a dual boot Linux installation. I just have not decided which distribution it's going to be.
While Linux has made tremendous strides in hardware compatibility and usually can work with most hardware right out of the box, it does not have the advantage of market critical mass and monopolistic power that Microsoft has. Thus, all vendors that sell hardware for the home PC provide drivers for Windows, being that Windows has about 95% of that market. That being said, Linux now has made tremdous stides in hardware support. It supports most major hardware products, but lacks in the area of some of the more exotic or bleeding edge graphics cards, sound cards, network cards, and most winmodems. It's getting better all the time (due to open source developers reverse engineering, and many vendors providing drivers), but Linux can't boast the level of hardware support that Windows can, due to market realities.
The people who gave bad reviews attempted to blindly install Red Hat Linux on their machines, without checking for hardware support ahead of time. Thus, due to hardware incompatibility or configuration, they had headaches and wrongly blamed Linux.
My personal experience with Linux in general and Red Hat 9 in particular has been wonderful. I've installed it on an IBM Thinkpad 600E. The installation went smoothly and I only had to manualy choose the correct video driver. It did not detect the Mwave internal winmodem (I expected this) and did not detect the sound card, but I do not need sound on my notebook. Apparently it is possible to configure so that Red Hat can use the sound card, but I don't need it. But Red Hat did seamlessly detect everything else and it all worked beautifully.
I've had a lot of fun with Linux. I'm a programmer and it is chaulk full of development tools (without having to pay mega $ for MS Visual Studio). Linux is a programmers paradise. It also has everything MS Office has (with Open Office and KOffice). It can manipulate graphics with the GIMP, it has tons of games, and endless configuration possibilties. RH Linux loads both the Gnome and KDE desktop environments, and it's fun to play with both, being that they are not exactly alike, and both have different strengths and weeknesses. And both, quite frankly, are much more attractive and fun to use than the Fisher Price interface of Windows XP. They are also far more configurable, with much more eye candy than XP. I've also been able to successfully download and install and use huge software titles like JBuilder 5 and Eclipse (Java Integrated Development Environments).
I've also been completely impressed with the amazing stability and efficiency of Linux. I can crash an application, but it never affects the OS. I just have to kill the app, and everything else goes about it's merry way without a hitch. Contrast that with Windows XP, and all of it's bugs and the slightest application problem can bring it to it's knees (prompting you to send a bug report to MS). Or, of course, the infamous Blue Screen of Death. No BSOD in Linux at all. And finally, there are far fewer virus worries with Linux.
In short, Linux is great. It might be a bit rough around the edges for some newbie/non technical users, but it is very easy to use (just requires a small learning curve, just like anything else new) and can do so many great things, at a small fraction of the cost of MS alternatives.
Those new to Linux should probablly start off with a distribution that runs from a CD, like Knoppix. Knoppix automatically detects and configures your hardware. All you have to do is pop the CD in and reboot. And it is completely risk free because it does not touch your hard drive. Knoppix can give you a taste of how great Linux can be. And if you like what you see, you should first check hardware compatibility at the distros web site, than
probably re-partition your hard drive with Partition magic. And of the distro set up routines will detect the partitions and allow you easily set up a dual boot PC. Alternatively, buy a whole new PC with Linux pre-loaded (ensuring hardware compatibility). You can do that here at Amazon, or Walmart or Lindows.com, or many others. You can get a new PC for as little as $200 (the cost of WinXP by itself).
But do give it a try and be prepared for hardware compatibility and that it is a different OS, so there will be a small learning curve. It's very well worth the effort.
The only reasons I did not give Red Hat Linux 9 the full 5 stars is because Red Hat has ended their retail product, concentrating on the enterprise. Also, Red Hat Linux does not include a disc partitioning tool like Mandrake and SuSE do. But I've loved it. I'm now looking forward to partitioning my eMachines PC with WinXP, and loading a dual boot Linux installation. I just have not decided which distribution it's going to be.
djf
5.0 out of 5 stars
BlueCurve is exceptional
Reviewed in the United States on April 4, 2003
I dual boot my Dell laptop (with no help from Dell because of Microsoft $$$) using XP and RedHat9.0.
With RH9 I can barely tell the difference between it and XP - plus all of my Office and Email packages are free. If it was not for the WinTel modem (Dell does not supply linux drivers) I would rarely need to even use XP - I used XP about 20% of the time with RH8 and only use XP about 5% of the time with RH9.
In summary I have one expensive XP install, and 6 other old computers on my home network running RedHat and SUSE for free.
... And Amazon[.com] did a great job sending RH9 - I just placed the order 2 days ago and thought it would take weeks.
With RH9 I can barely tell the difference between it and XP - plus all of my Office and Email packages are free. If it was not for the WinTel modem (Dell does not supply linux drivers) I would rarely need to even use XP - I used XP about 20% of the time with RH8 and only use XP about 5% of the time with RH9.
In summary I have one expensive XP install, and 6 other old computers on my home network running RedHat and SUSE for free.
... And Amazon[.com] did a great job sending RH9 - I just placed the order 2 days ago and thought it would take weeks.
James Lydon
5.0 out of 5 stars
Never used this item, but one day I'll try it on another computer.
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009
I've studied and worked with UNIX while attending computer school. My instructor always said that Linux was almost like UNIX but as a GUI (Graphical User Interface) similiar to Windows. I always had interest in learning Linux, but I don't know any software programs I can install that supports Linux. One day I'm going to build a Linux based PC and find Linux based software to work on while I'm using Linux.
Bigkahuna
1.0 out of 5 stars
Junk... would not boot past 2nd CD ...
Reviewed in the United States on August 16, 2015
Junk...would not boot past 2nd CD...