I would have given this book a 4.5, but only integer numbers of stars are available. I am a fan of Sabine's YouTube channel "Science without the gobbledygook", and this book reads like a detailed presentation on topics she might cover there, with easy-to-understand explanations, humor, background, and nice summaries. Sabine covers a lot of topics and pretty much all of them are interesting: does the universe think? Will we ever know it all? Was the universe made for us? Can a computer be conscious? What about artificial general intelligence?
What I like about Sabine's approach is equal time on multiple views of a topic, the science, and her view. She does this while still giving air time and showing respect for opinions she clearly doesn't agree with. I am an engineer and scientist and learned a lot from this book.
Here's the extra credit that's sprinkled through the entire book: a *very* crisp distinction between what is science and what is not science. When something isn't scientific, which Sabine calls ascientific, it doesn't mean it's wrong. It might be wrong. It might be true. It simply means it's neither provable nor falsifiable, nor does it make testable predictions. Religion isn't the only thing that is ascientific (again, doesn't mean it's wrong...just means it isn't science): theories of the origin of the big bang, the existence of multiple universes, etc. These may be proposed by scientists, but that doesn't make them science. This distinction is not a judgement or criticism. But it is an important distinction.
I won't spoil the epilog, but I found a few gems to think about there.
This is an easy book to pick up and read several pages, then come back to it. I purchased the combined Kindle and audio version so I could go back and forth during a trip. The woman who reads the audio book reader is good, but I would have paid $20 extra to hear Sabine read the book. I can hear her voice in my mind from her YouTube channel when reading the book in text form.
OK, so why not 5 stars? There's names of scientists and concepts (like the NavierStokes equations) that could have had more explanation for non-scientific readers. As an engineer/scientist, I knew what all these were, but the book is otherwise so well written for a general audience that I felt like she should have spent a little more time with some history and explanation of scientists and concepts.
Conclusion: recommended for all audiences, scientific and not. A pretty good book. Gets better as you go. Easy to pick up and put down. You could just read the chapters you are interested in, but I predict you'll want to read all of them. Fun.
Existential Physics: A Scientist's Guide to Life's Biggest Questions
4.5
| 1,086 ratingsPrice: 15.75
Last update: 07-22-2024