Semicolon: The Past, Present, and Future of a Misunderstood Mark
4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars | 377 ratings
Price: 14.17
Last update: 08-27-2024
About this item
A pause-resisting, existential romp through the life and times of the world’s most polarizing punctuation mark.
The semicolon. Stephen King, Hemingway, Vonnegut, and Orwell detest it. Herman Melville, Henry James, and Rebecca Solnit love it. But why? When is it effective? Have we been misusing it? Should we even care?
In Semicolon, Cecelia Watson charts the rise and fall of this infamous punctuation mark, which for years was the trendiest one in the world of letters. But in the 19th century, as grammar books became all the rage, the rules of how we use language became both stricter and more confusing, with the semicolon a prime victim.
Taking us on a breezy journey through a range of examples - from Milton’s manuscripts to Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “Letters from Birmingham Jail” to Raymond Chandler’s The Big Sleep - Watson reveals how traditional grammar rules make us less successful at communicating with each other than we’d think. Even the most die-hard grammar fanatics would be better served by tossing the rule books and learning a better way to engage with language.
Through her rollicking biography of the semicolon, Watson writes a guide to grammar that explains why we don’t need guides at all and refocuses our attention on the deepest, most primary value of language: true communication.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.
Top reviews from the United States
But apart from that small objection, I had a great time.
My interest waned a little in the middle where various authors' usage of the semicolon were compared, but the case was well-made, and the book wrapped up on a good note. Highly recommend.
(I took off a star due to my own drop in the middle, but you may dig historical literature comparisons. It wasn't my thing however.)
Watson's conflict as a grammar nerd who questions dogma comes out awkwardly in the last chapter, which starts by attacking grammar snobbery and ends up, unsurprisingly in 2021, bowing to faddism. She quotes D.F. Wallace arguing for the importance of mastering Standard Written English, and seems to strenuously miss his point in an attempt to score social justice points. As someone who despises Infinite Jest, I was more persuaded by DFW's fairly benign passage than by Watson's political tokenism.
Finally, it's an insufferable grammar nerd thing to correct someone's grammar incorrectly. In the notes she mentions having to bite her tongue not to correct someone who uses "gin and tonics" instead of "gins and tonic." Unless she's ordering her tonic in a separate glass ("gins with tonic"), she's ordering a mixed drink named "gin and tonic," the plural of which is "gin and tonics."
These questions are front and center in this book, as are instances illustrating the real-life importance of punctuation in communication. The consequences of over-focusing on punctuation according to the rules, rather than the intent of writers, are illustrated by some horrible examples of criminal law gone wrong.