
Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars | 676 ratings
Price: 17.46
Last update: 03-14-2025
About this item
In a revelatory and pathbreaking work, the #1 international bestselling economist opens our eyes to the new power that is reshaping our lives and the world . . .
Big tech has replaced capitalism's twin pillars—markets and profit—with its platforms and rents. With every click and scroll, we labor like serfs to increase its power.
Welcome to technofeudalism . . .
Perhaps we were too distracted by the pandemic, or the endless financial crises, or the rise of TikTok. But under cover of them all, a new and more exploitative system has been taking hold. Insane sums of money that were supposed to re-float our economies after the crash of 2008 went to big tech instead. With it they funded the construction of their private cloud fiefdoms and privatized the internet.
Technofeudalism says Yanis Varoufakis, is the new power that is reshaping our lives and the world, and is the greatest current threat to the liberal individual, to our efforts to avert climate catastrophe—and to democracy itself. It also lies behind the new geopolitical tensions, especially the New Cold War between the United States and China.
Drawing on stories from Greek myth and pop culture, from Homer to Mad Men, Varoufakis explains this revolutionary transformation: how it enslaves our minds, how it rewrites the rules of global power, and, ultimately, what it will take overthrow it.
Top reviews from the United States

5.0 out of 5 stars Time to Examine Our Heritage and Direction

4.0 out of 5 stars Solid critique and he offers a good solution in the end.
Unfortunately, because it offers a new way of thinking that tries to depart from the black/white, communist vs capital world we are used to at the end, people will probably ignore it. Or get scared of it and describe it as something it is not. Which of course makes it the reason everyone should read it.

5.0 out of 5 stars A very important book for the troubles ahead.

5.0 out of 5 stars An interesting (if not under discussed) perspective
While I may not fully agree with the end solution, I do unfortunately agree with pretty much everything else written. I also appreciate the irony of positing this review into the algorithms of one of the cloud capitalists.

5.0 out of 5 stars Important moment in modern economic theory

3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting POV, but wrong
Why is technofeudalism as a new term wrong? IMO, for several reasons:
Feudalism ensured that serfs had no choice. They could only work for the fiefdom, usually farming. They could no move to another fief. The harvest that they had to turn over only benefitted the fief lord.
Firstly, In reality, there is no forced working for low wages or for free for the platforms. One can avoid the platforms entirely. Even if you don't, platforms like Amazon, do have competitors, e.g. Walmart for groceries. So the control is only partial. Facebook and Apple do create walled gardens that make escaping hard. I am particularly thinking about Apple's iTunes which has a very high wall to escape if you have extensive playlists. So while the platforms do their best to keep suppliers and users, this is not like medieval feudalism.
Secondly, the free work we users provide as "technoserfs" does provide value to the user. Amazon's reviews, however imperfect and gamed, provide valuable feedback on products and services, that one doesn't get at brick-and-mortar stores.
Thirdly, the claim that manufacturers of MUST use the platform to benefit the platform fief or die is extreme. There are many manufacturers that do not, as even the most cursory glance would tell you, and they seem to do fine.
Yes, the growth of the biggest platforms did benefit from post-2008 financial collapse low-cost capital. But as Ben Thompson (Stratechery.com) has long explained, there is huge value to be gained from aggregation. It reduces search costs, creates simplified transactions, and the network effect benefits users.
The real problem is the government, especially in the US, of allowing platforms to control user inputs and extracting very high rents for sellers. This is allowing the same evils that monopolists and monopsonists have demonstrated in the past and could be legislated against. It is why we don't like "company towns", and use antitrust to create competition. If our data was legally ours, and there was forced interoperability using standards, then the walled gardens would be much lower.
So while Varoufakis has identified some features of the problems of platforms, he analysis is forced, and I believe, incorrect.
Having said that, the book is an easy read, with and interesting family backstory, and an interesting presentation rather like an extended letter to his very Communist father. I didn't find the analysis convincing, and his utopian economic solution for the post-capitalist world even less so. YMMV.

5.0 out of 5 stars This is a serious explanation from a serious economist - a must read.
Where we are right now and how we got there, and why, from feudalism itself to the present cloud driven economy.