
Travels with George: In Search of Washington and His Legacy
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars | 1,188 ratings
Price: 17.72
Last update: 02-28-2025
About this item
New York Times Best Seller
“Travels with George...is quintessential Philbrick - a lively, courageous, and masterful achievement.” (The Boston Globe)
Does George Washington still matter? Best-selling author Nathaniel Philbrick argues for Washington’s unique contribution to the forging of America by retracing his journey as a new president through all 13 former colonies, which were now an unsure nation. Travels with George marks a new first-person voice for Philbrick, weaving history and personal reflection into a single narrative.
When George Washington became president in 1789, the United States of America was still a loose and quarrelsome confederation and a tentative political experiment. Washington undertook a tour of the ex-colonies to talk to ordinary citizens about his new government, and to imbue in them the idea of being one thing - Americans.
In the fall of 2018, Nathaniel Philbrick embarked on his own journey into what Washington called “the infant woody country” to see for himself what America had become in the 229 years since. Writing in a thoughtful first person about his own adventures with his wife, Melissa, and their dog, Dora, Philbrick follows Washington’s presidential excursions: from Mount Vernon to the new capital in New York; a monthlong tour of Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island; a venture onto Long Island and eventually across Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina. The narrative moves smoothly between the eighteenth and twenty-first centuries as we see the country through both Washington’s and Philbrick’s eyes.
Written at a moment when America’s founding figures are under increasing scrutiny, Travels with George grapples bluntly and honestly with Washington’s legacy as a man of the people, a reluctant president, and a plantation owner who held people in slavery. At historic houses and landmarks, Philbrick reports on the reinterpretations at work as he meets reenactors, tour guides, and other keepers of history’s flame. He paints a picture of 18th-century America as divided and fraught as it is today, and he comes to understand how Washington compelled, enticed, stood up to, and listened to the many different people he met along the way - and how his all-consuming belief in the union helped to forge a nation.
Top reviews from the United States

5.0 out of 5 stars If you like history spiced with humor, this book is for you
The author uses John Steinbeck's "Travels With Charlie" as something of a guidepost. Following in Washington's footsteps, his account (like Steinbeck's) is highly personal, humorous, and vastly entertaining. If you like history spiced with humor, this book is for you
As our nation's first president, George Washington took a number of trips, of which little has been written. The first was his 250-mile journey, from his home in Mount Vernon, Virginia, to New York City, to take office as president. The second was a month-long tour of New England. The third was a tour of Long Island; the fourth was a boat trip to Rhode Island; the fifth and longest, was a tour of the southern states.
As the author was to discover, many of the social problems Washington encountered, such as slavery and distrust of the federal government, have ramifications to this day. However, what Washington achieved was to unify the nation behind the new federal government, and he did this by speaking with people everywhere he went, from New England farmers and shopkeepers, to Southern plantation owners and innkeepers. It was retail politics at its best, one man unifying politics behind a single idea--representative government.
By way of a visit to Mount Vernon, the author discusses Washington's ownership of slaves. Particularly of how his view of the "peculiar institution" changed over the years. Washington was, in some ways, the cruelest of slave masters. But with time, his attitude changed dramatically, particularly during the Revolutionary War, when he spent most of his time in the North, and saw African American slaves in an entirely new light. Indeed, as free men they made excellent soldiers, as capable as anyone. At the close of the war, with slavery becoming an increasingly divisive issue, Washington decided if civil war should come, he would leave his native Virginia and side with the North. In his later years, Washington put it in his will to have his slaves freed upon his death, something no other slaveholding founding father, however enlightened, dared to do.
No matter which part of the country Washington was in, slavery played a role. In New England, where the textile industry was king, and factory workers were paid a salary, the mills were fed by cotton grown in the slave-holding southern states.
While in Newport, Rhode Island, Washington met Moses Seixas, a member of Newport's Jewish congregation. It was a meeting that revealed just how far Washington's views of liberty had advanced, since his days as an entitled Virginia Grandee. Seixas was among a group of Jews whose fore-bearers had been driven out of Spain in 1658, crossed the Atlantic, and found a religious haven in the American colonies. Seixes wanted to know if he and his Jewish brethren were guaranteed religious freedom in the new republic. Washington's written response is among his greatest state papers, and a primer on what it means to be an American. In short, Washington stated that in a country based on the principle that everyone is created equal, mere tolerance of others is not enough; we must honor their innate right to freedom. Writes the author: "It is a message that is as important today as it was in August 1790. . . ."
Another poignant moment, was while the author was in Savanah, Georgia, touring that city's historic district. The tour began at the monument to Tomo-Chi-Chi, chief of the Yamacraw Indians, the region's original inhabitants. The tour wound through Savannah's back alleys, passed by several market squares, where slaves were once auctioned off, and concluded at tree-lined Johnson Square, where historic Christ Church is located. Washington attended a Sunday service at this Church on the morning he left Savannah. Seated on a park bench beside tour director Vaugnette Goode-Walker, she pointed out, "This was one of the largest slave yards in America, and it all happened in front of a church." Writes author: "We could hear the service going on inside." "Today, most of Savannah is Black," continued the tour director, "but not up in the historic district." She looked at her watch, and said ruefully. "Eleven o'clock Sunday morning. The most segregated hour in America."
Most of Washington's journey to the south was near the coast, over mostly unfinished roads, with stops in New Bern, Charleston, and his farthest destination, Savannah. However, his journey home was through the south's undeveloped interior, over little more than Indian paths--with stops in Augusta, Columbia, Camden, Salem, Salisbury, Fredericksburg (Washington's birthplace), and the nation's new capital, then known as Washington City, on to Baltimore, and his final destination, the then-current capital in Philadelphia. The author saw a number of civil war monuments along the way, many of which of which had recently been removed, such as in Richmond, where only pedestals remained, where once stood monuments to Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.
While in Washington, D.C., the author visited the new National Museum of African American History and Culture "burnished and glinting in the afternoon sun." Getting in was a huge problem, as the line was quite long. Indeed, the author was informed that the museum was by far the most popular in Washington, D.C., attracting between three thousand and five thousand visitors a day. (The author and his wife were able to get in when a stranger offered them two tickets.)
The author recently told a major newspaper, that he was surprised at how timely his book had become. "This was going to be a road trip but led into issues that feel so current today. It's the first principle of any journey. As Steinbeck says, you don't control a journey, a journey controls you."

4.0 out of 5 stars Interesting read

5.0 out of 5 stars Unity of the new nation was critical to its survival
Travels with George, Nathaniel Philbrick
November 14, 2021
“But as anyone who knew Washington understood, his only interest was in
establishing a federal government that was strong enough to survive without him.”
Travels with George, 2021
Nathaniel Philbrick (1956-)
In 1789, newly inaugurated as the country’s first President, George Washington recognized that for the nation to endure the individual states had to be united in a common bond, based on principles of self-government, individual liberty and the rule of law. He knew there were challenges. The industrialized north and the agrarian south were different. The country’s citizens had come from multiple European countries and spoke several languages. It was populated with men and women with differing dreams, aspirations and talents. And he knew that he was uniquely situated to help foster that unity.
As commanding officer of the army that had defeated the British empire, he had traveled to most parts of the country. Now, he felt it imperative, as President, that he visit each of the thirteen states that had ratified the Constitution and imbue the nation’s citizens with a sense of unity and national pride.
Between October 1789 and July 1791, President Washington devoted 16 weeks to traveling as far north as Portsmouth, New Hampshire and as far south as Savannah, Georgia. Nathaniel Philbrick, in his informative and readable history, Travels with George, recounts those trips. In the fall of 2018, prompted by John Steinbeck’s Travels with Charlie, Mr. Philbrick, his wife Melissa and dog Dora started out on their own trip, following, as best he could, in the footsteps of George Washington. His purpose in writing this book: “More than ever before, Americans need to know what our first president did, at the very beginning, to bring this nation together.” We follow Washington along rutted dirt roads (with Philbrick in his air-conditioned Honda), to New England villages and factories, through longleaf pine forests in the Carolinas, to rice plantations in Georgia. As for security on Washington’s trip across unpopulated sections of the country, “…the affection of his fellow citizens was all the guard he wanted.”
Philbrick’s own journey, which he shares with the reader, followed Washington’s as closely as possible. In doing so, he makes us realize the tremendous growth the country has experienced. In a time of bifurcated political feelings, the author ponders as to whether Washington’s legacy is worth preserving. His conclusion is, yes. He writes as to how catastrophes are always around the corner, but this time it feels different: “The sinews of this country have been stretched to what feels like the breaking point,” but if the sinews should break, “it won’t be Washington’s and Jefferson’s fault…The fault will lie with ourselves.”
Mr. Philbrick devotes a lot of time to the subject of slavery, an evil practice, which was common at the time among land-owning southerners, while less common, though not unheard of, in the north. The practice bothered Washington who knew it was wrong, but felt trapped in its grip, as slaves represented a large portion of his wealth and were critical to the economics of his Virginia plantation. We follow Mr. Philbrick as he leads us through the evolution of Washington’s thoughts on slavery. According to the terms of his will, his slaves were set free after his death.
In writing through the lens of today’s moral values, Mr. Philbrick comes across as a bit of a scold, more interested in flouting his woke credentials than in enlightening the reader as to values of yesterday. For example, he writes approvingly of crowds pulling down statues of Confederates: “History isn’t being lost when a statue is toppled to the ground. History is being made.” George Washington, in contrast, condemned those who destroyed a statue of King George III in New York in 1776. Who was the more magnanimous?
Two hundred and thirty-two years have passed since George Washington took to the road to help unify the newly-free country. That this nation, against all odds, still stands as a beacon to the world that self-government can succeed among myriad peoples, we owe, in large part, to our first President. Washington was sensitive to regional differences and the wide diversity of the American people. Yet he recognized that united the nation would succeed; divided it would fall. Today, politicians and the media encourage polarization, sensing it brings out the vote and sells more ads. The people, in my opinion, are wiser. They recognize we will never settle all differences, but, so long as opinions can be freely expressed, we will be fine. In yesterday’s The Wall Street Journal, Christopher DeMuth wrote: “Citizens understand that their security and freedoms depend on their nation and its imperfect institutions – that their fortunes are linked for better or worse to those of their disparate compatriots.” What was true in Washington’s time is true today. We have differences. We are linked as Americans. United, we thrive. Divided, we fail.
This is a light but informative read. One finishes the story recognizing the importance of Washington’s trip, knowing more about our country then and now, and liking Nathaniel Philbrick, his wife and his dog.

5.0 out of 5 stars A must read!

3.0 out of 5 stars Traveling with the Philbricks
The book is at its best when it is recounting Washington's experience. When the book is in the present, the Philbricks barely get out of the car, meeting sometimes with relatives and friends who run local historical sites.
The book invites comparison with Steinbeck's Travels with Charlie but the book falls far short of what I understood was Steinbeck's objective with the book, which was to get to know his country. (Full Disclosure - I haven't read Travels with Charlie.)
This is a serious, talented historian, who is slumming here. I see some other reviewers are swearing not to read anything else by him, which truthfully, I think is shortsighted. I am more inclined to give him a mulligan on this one, and hope he gets back to business with his next book.
