The Master Builder: How the New Science of the Cell Is Rewriting the Story of Life
4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars | 111 ratings
Price: 15.3
Last update: 12-17-2024
About this item
"An ingenious argument" (Kirkus) for a "novel thesis" (Publishers Weekly) that cells, not DNA, hold the key to understanding life's past and present
What defines who we are? For decades, the answer has seemed obvious: our genes, the "blueprint of life." In The Master Builder, biologist Alfonso Martinez Arias argues we've been missing the bigger picture. It's not our genes that define who we are, but our cells. While genes are important, nothing in our DNA explains why the heart is on the left side of the body, how many fingers we have, or even how our cells manage to reproduce. Drawing on new research from his own lab and others, Martinez Arias reveals that we are composed of a thrillingly intricate, constantly moving symphony of cells. Both their long lineage—stretching back to the very first cell—and their intricate interactions within our bodies today make us who we are.
Engaging and ambitious, The Master Builder will transform your understanding of our past, present, and future—as individuals and as a species.
Top reviews from the United States
5.0 out of 5 stars Awesome book! Really makes you think...
4.0 out of 5 stars Me the cell
5.0 out of 5 stars A Master Teacher and Writer
What I find most mind-boggling: We are composed of 40 trillion human cells living in symbiosis with 100 trillion bacteria. That’s 140 trillion living organisms in a huge, multilayered community, in continuous communication. From what I’ve read, I think of cells as exemplifying social cognition. Reading through this book cemented that conviction. Then I got to page 302, the last page in the book: “Cells are intuitive and social, sensing and reactive to their environment in a complex, emergent manner.” I am not crazy to think of cells as mind-like. But their capacity to get along with each other in a 140-trillion numbered community is a lot better than ours.
5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing
5.0 out of 5 stars very readable
4.0 out of 5 stars Exposition on Developmental Biology is Good - But Anti-Genomics Diatribes are Tiresome
5.0 out of 5 stars Science must retain this important perspective
1.0 out of 5 stars I made it to page 23
Page 22: "...it is nearly impossible to define what an individual gene is." No, no it's not. Just search for "gene definition biology" then click on the first link and you'll know the definition of a gene. Search for 'gene definition biology debate" and the first link from your previous search is the 4th link. Of course the definition of gene has changed from the 1860's, but there is not a debate over what a gene is.
Page 23: "For example, if a gene is 4 letters long, ..." I hope he knows that is not how biologists describe gene length. Search for "unit for describing gene length". They are not called 'letters' because they are bases. And RNA needs 3 bases to use 1 amino acid. That 4th base can't be possible. 3 and 6 are possible, but not 5, which is the next example used in the book. At the bottom of page 23: an 11 base long sequence.
I had high hopes for reading this book. I wanted this book to be great. I hope the editor was someone who took biology in high school and never took another class all the way through university. There is no way someone who could coauthor a biology textbook titled Principles of Development could have written this book. Either way, it is in the recycle bin now. YMMV.