Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln's Killer
4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars | 2,546 ratings
Price: 25.19
Last update: 11-27-2024
About this item
The murder of Abraham Lincoln set off the greatest manhunt in American history. From April 14 to April 26, 1865, the assassin, John Wilkes Booth, led Union cavalry and detectives on a wild 12-day chase through the streets of Washington, DC, across the swamps of Maryland, and into the forests of Virginia while the nation, still reeling from the just-ended Civil War, watched in horror and sadness.
James L. Swanson's Manhunt is a fascinating tale of murder, intrigue, and betrayal. A gripping hour-by-hour account told through the eyes of the hunted and the hunters, this is history as you've never listened to it before.
Top reviews from the United States
Of course I knew all that. A long time ago I had learned about it way back in elementary school. This was one of those facts that every American child has to memorize. But of course there was a story that made these facts come alive, a story that James L. Swanson meticulously researched and brought to light in a new non-fiction historical account of the events of those days. It was a book that pulled me to it. I wanted to know more.
John Wilkes Booth, a renowned actor with Southern roots had always hated Lincoln. Throughout the war he plotted to kidnap him and had a few cohorts willing to join this plot. But as the War came to an end and the Union victory was real, the plot changed from kidnapping to assassination. John Wilkes Booth planned carefully, and, drawing in a group of co-conspirators, actually accomplished this on the night of April 14, 1865 while Lincoln was celebrating his victory by attending a performance at Ford's Theater in Washington D.C. Booth was an actor and knew the theater intimately. Lincoln wasn't expecting it and didn't stand a chance against the single gunshot wound to his head.
This book is the story of the assassination and of the 12-day manhunt for Booth. The details are all there, the planning, the horror of the act itself, the quick actions of the doctor to keep Lincoln alive through the night, and the mourning and outpouring of grief of the public. Also here is a thorough analysis of the mind of the killer and his attempts to get away. There's a whole cast of characters who helped Booth, some of them more willingly than others. The original plot also included the murder of Vice President Andrew Johnson, Secretary of State William Seward and Secretary of War Edwin Stanton but the attempts on their lives did not result in their deaths.
All these stories are interwoven, creating a fascinating mosaic of the United States in 1865. Each person involved, including the officers searching for the killer and the Southerners who gave Booth shelter are brought to life. Booth's leg was injured and he relied a lot on his companion David E. Herold. Their flight from justice took them through Maryland and to Virginia. Sometimes they were given food and shelter but for much of the time they had to live in the woods. Eventually Booth was gunned down and lived a few more hours in agony. Later, some of the people who had helped him were hanged.
I loved the book. I felt I was right there in 1865. I was there with Lincoln, I was there at the attack on Secretary of State Seward, I was in the farmhouses and fields with Booth. His diary says a lot about his state of mind and the newspapers of the time give the sense of what was going on in the country. And then there are some photos of Booth, the theater, and the people who were eventually arrested. It was all there in this one book. It put me in a time and place that I had never really understood before. This is a great story, well told. And the best part about it is that it is true. Highly recommended.
Swanson's book is a well written narrative of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, and the twelve-day dragnet to capture Booth after the murder. It’s a very good read that draws you in quickly, and it’s a valuable resource for anyone wanting to delve deeply into the assassination events. I’m skeptical, however, of any book claiming to know the “authentic” words spoken by people in the past. Few ever immediately recorded what they actually said in a conversation, and memory can be quite faulty within minutes, yet alone years. In the “Note to the Reader" section, Swanson says, “Their [characters] words are authentic. Indeed, all text appearing within quotation marks comes from original sources: letters, manuscripts, affadavits, trial transcripts, …”. Clearly, Swanson wants the reader to believe he did his research diligently, and the reader should accept as fact any words in quotes.
Within a few pages, however, Swanson claims Booth utters to David Herold, “That means n***** citizenship, now, by God, I’ll put him through.” in response to Lincoln suggesting to a crowd gathered at the Executive Mansion on April 11th, 1865, that specific colored people be given the vote. In the “Notes" section of the book, Swanson infers that Lewis Powell, just before his hanging, told Thomas Eckert of the War Department, that Booth said this. Had Swanson done his research properly, he would know Booth never uttered these words. Worse yet, Swanson intentionally misleads the reader about this by cleverly linking it to something Powell actually did tell Eckert. The first time anything Booth said at Lincoln's speech on April 11th was revealed to the public was when Eckert testified at the Andrew-Johnson impeachment proceedings. Eckert never claimed Powell told him Booth uttered, “n***** citizenship”. The origin of this controversial statement by Booth is in a novel George Alfred Townsend published in 1895. Townsend manufactured these words out of whole cloth, simply for dramatic effect, and 'historians' have accepted it as fact ever since. Had Swanson investigated the primary sources for this incident, he would know this. In our overly sensitive society today, most 'historians' won't even repeat the phrase "n***** citizenship" in public for fear of offending someone in their audience. If the reader cannot trust Swanson on something as important as this, how can the reader trust the authenticity of anything he puts in quotes in his book?
Learned a lot!
Good writing!