The Intelligence Trap: Why Smart People Make Dumb Mistakes

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars | 369 ratings

Price: 18.8

Last update: 08-02-2024


Top reviews from the United States

Raymond Usell
5.0 out of 5 stars This book will help you "Know Thyself"
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2019
This is an important book about a topic of supreme importance. Roughly 3/4ths through it, I feared I would rate it only 4 stars because of two almost irritating weaknesses. First, it was far more loosely written, less structured, more repetitive than I like. I kept thinking, one more rewrite could easily shorten it 20%. Second, the author’s liberal biases showed more than I thought a book warning about bias should depict. Then, I applied one of its key lessons – always challenge initial reactions. Ask yourself if you could be wrong. I now rate it a solid 5 stars. Here’s why.

As to its importance: We are classified as Homo Sapiens Sapiens. To me, Homo means almost hairless bipedal primate. To me, Sapiens means thinking. The second Sapiens means we are primates able to think about how we think. The daily news proves many powerful people and voters do not. And that failure also contributes to extreme polarization.

As to the writing: One important insight in the book is the counter-intuitive notion that fluency can decrease the depth of understanding achieved and the retention of learning. Example: At one point, the author mentions research he says reveals six important concepts. Then, in a rambling way, he says something about each of the six. It was hard for me to distinguish the concepts from the descriptors since each could be used as a noun or an adjective. I wished he had simply made a numbered or bullet list. He was forcing me into what is called “productive struggle.” It’s the mental equivalent of “no pain; no gain” of physical training.

Also, the author spreads the description of some psychological research across many chapters forcing one to try to recall details of the testing repeatedly. That’s called “chunking,” another proven but counter-intuitive beneficial approach to teaching. This author practices what he teaches.

As to visible liberal bias: I’m conservative; the bias makes the book more useful for me. I’ve tried to engage liberal acquaintances in friendly truth-seeking dialogue for decades and find very few willing to. Several conservative friends have the same experience. I plan to use this book to encourage my liberal relatives and friends to dialogue. I can say to them, “here is a book by an author more like you than like me. You will like its tone and examples. And it will be helpful to us both as we explore issues. Reading it was humbling; I’ve fallen into every trap it describes.” To my, let’s say, dogmatic conservative friends I can say, “this book’s liberal bias will be great practice for you. If you can read it without a blood pressure spike, you are ready for calm dialogue.”

I particularly liked this author’s extensive use of Richard P. Feynman as an exemplar of well-rounded thinking excellence. And for we structured readers, towards the end, the author includes bullet lists and a convenient glossary of key terms.

Face it. None of us has flawless thinking. The best chance to detect flaws is open honest truth-seeking dialogue with someone different from yourself. This book will help you have it.
Dennis Mancl
5.0 out of 5 stars Good constructive advice on how to make fewer mistakes
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2022
The main theme of the book is that even smart people make mistakes in logic. In fact, there are many kinds of logical errors that occur *more often* in well-educated people. Robson presents a wide range of useful ideas from psychology to support and explain his thesis. But -- what I liked the most in the book -- Robson gives some constructive approaches for us to do better. Robson's suggestions are a lot more specific than the usual "teach critical thinking skills." Robson dives into a bunch of pragmatic ideas from psychology that help: learning about the kinds of errors that experts make (such as being in a hurry to make a judgment introduces errors), considering the perspectives of other people, becoming aware of your own bias blind spots, and improving your ability to reflect on your own emotional state (yes, including mindfulness meditation but also a simple reflection process with a checklist).
Isaac
4.0 out of 5 stars Even Smart People Do Dumb Things
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2019
This book is about why a high IQ in itself is not enough to guarantee success in any area of life. However, the author does not devalue IQ totally. Arthur Jensen in his magisterial THE G FACTOR (not cited by Robson) would agree. Jensen convincingly shows that the "g" factor (general factor) is an element in all aspects of life, but in this book IQ appears to be a matter of "necessary, but not sufficient." Robson goes beyond and explains what else is needed to make life and organizations successful or how through assorted “dysrational” behaviors things can go wrong. The author has many examples of smart people doing dumb things. For example, Steve Jobs might be alive today if he hadn’t defied common medical practice and tried to cure his cancer with quack remedies. He also explains how Arthur Conan Coyle, Thomas Edison and Albert Einstein fell into the intelligence trap.

Very helpful and interesting is his taxonomy of stupidity and wisdom at the end of the book. It’s a handy reference to the ways (described throughout the book) in which people can do stupid or smart things. As far as I know, he coined the word “dysrationalia,” defined in the taxonomy as “The mismatch between intelligence and rationality.” He uses the word throughout the text.

I was surprised to learn that my lifelong habit of reading books of all kinds is actually giving me
a dose of dopamine every time I read one!

Now to my one quibble with the book.

Michael Shermer (pp. 159-162) is not the crusader for open-mindedness that he would like us to think he is and convinced Robson that he is. He's great if he is debunking diet fads, astrology, bogus health claims, other people's
religion (he wrote a column in the Scientific America last Easter attackingthe Resurrection), but he will not exhibit
the same open-mindedness in other areas. For example, apparently he is not skeptical of the warnings associated with climate change but of those who are skeptical (158). In other words, climate change problems are a given and not subject to critical analysis. Not the J.S, Mill or Karl Popper approach to open mindedness.

Shermer’s book DENYING HISTORY is a passionate defense of some truly absurd claims, which should be subject to the same critical scrutiny that he practices with everybody else's absurd claims. If he is true to his role as
professional skeptic, he should be prepared to evaluate his own beliefs as assiduously as he evaluates the beliefs of others—and allow others to do so as well.. Not the case. “ Shermer emphasizes the importance of keeping an open mind” 161). Not when it comes to what he believes.

Read his book DENYING HISTORY and decide if It’s not full of absurd claims.
john scheelk
5.0 out of 5 stars a good read
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2023
A great book for high IQ people to read and discuss

Best Sellers in

 
 

Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow

4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 36636
23.62
 
 

Astrophysics for People in a Hurry

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 36741
10.2
 
 

The Book of Hope: A Survival Guide for Trying Times

4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 2649
13.12
 
 

Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies

4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 13791
19.69
 
 

Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will

4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 1199
19.69
 
 

A Short History of Nearly Everything

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 18094
21.66
 
 

The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

4.8 4.8 out of 5 stars 26087
26.21
 
 

A Brief History of Intelligence: Evolution, AI, and the Five Breakthroughs That Made Our Brains

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 470
22.04