Ingredients: The Strange Chemistry of What We Put in Us and on Us
4.3 4.3 out of 5 stars | 179 ratings
Price: 13.78
Last update: 11-18-2024
About this item
Cheese puffs. Coffee. Sunscreen. Vapes. George Zaidan reveals what will kill you, what won’t, and why - explained with high-octane hilarity, hysterical hijinks, and other things that don’t begin with the letter H.
Ingredients offers the perspective of a chemist on the stuff we eat, drink, inhale, and smear on ourselves. Apart from the burning question of whether you should eat that Cheeto, Zaidan explores a range of topics. Here’s a helpful guide:
Stuff in this book:
- How bad is processed food? How sure are we?
- Is sunscreen safe? Should you use it?
- Is coffee good or bad for you?
- What’s your disease horoscope?
- What is that public pool smell made of?
- What happens when you overdose on fentanyl in the sun
- What do cassava plants and Soviet spies have in common?
- When will you die?
Stuff in other books:
- Your carbon footprint
- Food sustainability
- GMOs
- CEO pay
- Science funding
- Politics
- Football
- Baseball
- Any kind of ball really
Zaidan, an MIT-trained chemist who cohosted CNBC’s hit Make Me a Millionaire Inventor and wrote and voiced several TED-Ed viral videos, makes chemistry more fun than Hogwarts as he reveals exactly what science can (and can’t) tell us about the packaged ingredients sold to us every day. Sugar, spinach, formaldehyde, cyanide, the ingredients of life and death, and how we know if something is good or bad for us - as well as the genius of aphids and their butts - are all discussed in exquisite detail at breakneck speed.
Includes a PDF of the author’s illustrations as well as the appendix about prayer and death.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.
Top reviews from the United States
You need not have access to all of the original reports of studies to be able to get a feel for how instructive, or not, that they might be. The author has you think about key questions that always need to be raised, and that can help you be more realistic in your evaluation and less subject to being misled, such as:
What exactly are we talking about here?
How was it studied, or even how could it have been studied, and measured?
How large an effect was observed?…”statistically significant” may not be very significant.
Are these things that appear to be “linked” the result of cause and effect, and how would we know?
A strength of the book is the careful explanations of how a given thing is measured, or a given effect is studied. For example, the SPF of a sunscreen might be tossed off with a comment such as “SPF is the factor by which the UV-blocking effect of the sunscreen compares to no sunscreen.” That is not a very helpful description. The author instead describes just how the measurement of SPF is done, giving the reader a much better understanding of what the SPF number means. He also provides a much more helpful explanation than is common in the media of how much less, or more, sunscreen of one SPF value vs. another SPF value reduces your exposure to UV radiation. He emphasizes not how much UV the sunscreen absorbs (the common but erroneous approach), but how much you end up absorbing.
The book is entertaining and easy to read, even though the information Is fundamental and not trivial. The author has a relaxed style, with plenty of colloquialisms. You may find that to be quite enjoyable, or you may think it was not all really necessary. But do not let that affect your reading of the important information contained there.
The excellent stuff in the book is in two categories: factual studies and methodology of science.
Excellent chapters that have detailed facts on biological processes, such as photosynthesis, insects using plants, how plants avoid being eaten, smoking and vaping details, etc.
The second category is excellent chapters on the significant faults to guard against in nutritional epidemiological methodology. This includes a great detailed description of the many, many methodological steps needed historically to prove, causally, that smoking leads frequently to lung cancer (and also why it doesn't do so most of the time.)
On the negative side, two more categories: as problems. One is mainly stylistic in that he seems fixated on writing as if he is a potty-mouthed 12 year old who revels in using all the gross words for bodily functions and yucky excretions. It's not cute, but tiresome. Two: despite so much good emphasis on a need for rigorous, logical methodology, he never defines highly processed foods, which is a core topic of the book, and while he bring in John Ioannidis work on methodology, and seems to be quite sympathetic to it, he ultimately waffles and doesn't come down on the side of rigor. Lastly the last chapter (the appendix) on the absurd "study" of prayer as a means of cure is completely worthless and out of place in this book on reason and logic in science.
But if you can hold your nose over the problems, there are some wonderful aspects of this book worth reading.